Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1924No. L. A. No. 6985Published

1Dissent

SEAWELL, J.,

Dissenting.—I dissent. The indisputable facts of this case are that defendant is a corporation, doing a general, seed and plant business throughout southern California, with its principal place of business at Los Angeles, this state. Plaintiff was engaged in raising for sale in the market of San Diego and vicinity a variety of celery known as the Golden Yellow. Eight acres of his eighteen-acre holding situate at Chula Vista, San Diego County, were devoted to this use. He had been a grower of celery for something like forty years.

On March 16, 1920, through the United States mail,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Borrekins v. Bevan & PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API