Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 9, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court .Replevin. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Wright, Ch. J.

Taking all the instructions asked and given, in connection, we find no error of which appellant should complain. If they were ever so erroneous, however, they are not properly before us for examination. On pages 12 to 16, inclusive, we find the instructions asked by the respective parties, eight by plaintiff, and seven by defendant, all of which were given. None of these instructions were marked “ excepted to; ” nor is there anything in connection with them to indicate that plaintiff objected at the time. In another part of the record, containing a bill of exceptions, there is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fromme v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Redman & Fear v. Malvin & CloudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Hunter v. Empire State Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Bartle v. PlaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Keller-Kohn Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API