Legal Opinion

Collett v. Cascade Health Care, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 1979No. A7611-15818, CA 13125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole assignment of error concerns the giving of n instruction which the plaintiff contends was er-oneous. Assuming for the sake of argument that the istruction was not a correct statement of law, and hat error was preserved by a proper objection and ansidering the challenged instruction in the context f the instructions as a whole, we nevertheless affirm. Or Const, Amended Art VII, § 3; ORS 19.125(2).

Affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rambo v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Utility Equipment, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Hudson v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988