Legal Opinion
Hakim v. Painewebber, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 24, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages based on the execution of a change of beneficiary form in connection with an Individual Retirement Account adoption agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated August 10, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff, Maurice C. Hakim, was the designated beneficiary of an Individual Retirement Account (hereinafter IRA) which was maintained at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beatrice J. Feins v. American Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lewis v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- 9 East 38th Street Associates v. George Feher Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Losco Group v. Yonkers Residential Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000