Legal Opinion

Soderlund v. Administrative Director of the Courts

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2001No. 23140PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that Respondent-Appellee Administrative Director of the Courts, State of Hawai'i (the Director) 1 is not required by Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 286-260 (Supp.2000) or by District Court Rules of Civil Procedure (DCRCP) Rule 72 to respond to a petition for judicial review of the Director’s hearing decision revoking a person’s driver’s license for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI), or to appear at the judicial hearing therefor. However, if the Director chooses not to respond, neither the foregoing statute nor rule allows the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Leslie v. Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lanai Co., Inc. v. Land Use Com'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cho v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Serrano v. BellamyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API