Humber v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for credit card abuse. Tex.Penal Code Ann. art. 32.31 (Vernon 1974). The jury set punishment at five years. Appellant was represented by different counsel at trial and on appeal. Appellant’s sole ground of error is that he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
The standard for determining whether effective assistance of counsel was available has been reviewed recently by the United States Supreme Court in Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980), and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex parte…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Passmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Khoi Trong Huynh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Poullard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Hutchinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.