Legal Opinion · Dissent

Canutillo Independent School District v. Martha Leija and Jerry Leija as Next Friends of Rosemarie Leija, a Minor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1997No. 95-50791Published

1DissentDennis, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

First, I disagree with the majority’s failure to consider and follow the substantial jurisprudential and regulatory developments that have taken place under Title IX since this court visited this fast changing legal area in Rowinsky v. Bryan ISD, 80 F.3d 1006 (5th Cir.1996). I am persuaded by the new developments that the substantive standards that have evolved under Title VII should be applied in actions for monetary damages under Title IX based on either the sexual harassment of a student by a school employee or the sexual harassment of a student by his or her peers.

Se…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API