In re the Marriage of Abercrombie
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Characterizing a provision for child support adjustments in a dissolution decree as “self-executing,” David Abercrombie seeks a retroactive calculation of his support obligation over the past 10 years. Such a retroactive adjustment is prohibited by statute. We affirm.
FACTS
David M. Abercrombie and Paula L. Congleton1 agreed to a decree of dissolution in 1989, which provided that Abercrombie would pay $1,000 per month for support of the parties’ two children. Because the parties’ circumstances were unsettled, the decree contained the following provisions under paragraph 5:
D. Annual Increase:
Fath…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kruger v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- In re the Marriage of BriscoeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Marriage of BriscoeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of Marriage of McDanielCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mecum v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In re the Marriage of AyyadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- In re the Marriage of AbercrombieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In re the Marriage of WatersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- In re the Marriage of KahleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006