Denmark v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm, as we did in Johns v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 375 So.2d 320 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), based on the reasoning in Williams v. Leatherby Insurance Company, 338 So.2d 70 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So.2d 429 (Fla.1977). We cannot, as appellant urges, subscribe to the view that in every instance in which a motor vehicle is inoperable, its owner need not maintain security as required by Section 627.733, Florida Statutes (1977). See Sherman v. Reserve Insurance Company, 350 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); nor can we formulate, as both parties request, a hard and fast rule…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tapscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Sherman v. Reserve Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Ward v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Williams v. Leatherby Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Johns v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fortune Ins. Co. v. OehmeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Harris v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983