Legal Opinion

Rosetta Gravel, Etc., Co. v. Bisso

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1904No. 3312Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Division B.

1Opinion of the CourtDufour, J.

This suit to recover the amount of a claim for street paving is resisted on various grounds.

1st. That the property is community, not paraphernal, and hence defendant cannot stand in judgment.

2nd. That the gravel was not laid on the street in front or abutting the property.

3rd. That the certificate upon which the suit is based is issued by one who was not City Surveyor at the time the work was done, and who was an assistant not legally authorized to sign a certificate,

4th. That the contract was made on illegal terms, the property-holders portion to be paid cash and the City’s on terms of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API