Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1972No. 7221DC89PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendants entered no exception to either of the numerous findings of fact made by the trial court and set forth in the judgment; their sole exception pertaining to the judgment is to the signing of the judgment. Exceptions 1, 2, 4 and 5 relate to the competency of certain evidence admitted or excluded at the trial; exceptions 3 and 6 relate to the failure of the trial court to grant defendants’ motions for directed verdict made at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

A general exception to the judgment and an assignment of error…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Smith v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Manufacturing Co. v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miles v. Carolina Forest Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Lenoir County SPCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Lenoir County SPCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API