Ditmars v. Sackett
New York Supreme Court
Action by George F. Ditmars and Abram E. Wyckoff, as executors of John V. Ditmars, deceased, against Frederick B. Sackett, W. Gilmore Sackett, and John H. Sackett. A verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, and defendants move for a new trial, on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first in- = stance.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The action is replevin to recover the possession of certain personal property, mentioned in and transferred by a chattel mortgage of date November 16, 1891, made by the defendant Frederick B. Sackett to the plaintiffs’ testator, to secure the payment of a promissory note of the same date, made by the defendants Frederick B. Sackett and W. Gilmore Sackett, for $150, payable to the testator three months after its date, with interest. The defense alleged is usury. The trial court refused to submit any question to the jury, and directed a verdict for the plaintiffs. Exceptions were taken by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Condit v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Rexford v. . KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- In Re the Probate of the Will of BernseeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Baldwin v. . DoyingNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griswold v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Vaughan v. Peoples Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- In re the Probate of the Will ValenteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- Terminal Bank v. DubroffNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- Stillwell v. BoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.