Legal Opinion

Paramount Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 29, 1958No. Reap. Dec. 9061; Entry No. 792968, etcPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to *673certain glass beaded necklaces and other items of jewelry, or glassware, that were exported from the Jablonec District of Czechoslovakia during the months of February, March, and April 1949. Entry was made at the port of New York.

The per se values of the various articles are not in dispute. The sole question before me is whether an item described on the invoices as “15% buying commission” is a part of export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Case & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Gehrig, Hoban & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Paramount Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Gehrig, Hoban & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API