Legal Opinion

McKee v. Grand Rapids & Reed's Lake Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from. Kent. Foreclosure. Defendant Union Iron Works Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

The object of the bill in this case is to foreclose a mortgage on the property and franchises of the street railway company, in favor of alleged bondholders. A foreclosure decree was granted, and no one appeals but the Union Iron Works Company. The *276questions raised only become important so far as they affect that company. As against every one else it must be assumed the bonds and mortgage are binding and the right to foreclose complete. This will make it proper to dispense with any reeitai beyond what may be necessary to dispose of the rights of the appellant.

Appellant was brought in by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Brotherton v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co. v. Oconto Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Detroit v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1893
  5. Massachusetts Port Authority v. Clerk of the East Boston District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API