Legal Opinion
In Re Sainlar
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 21, 2006No. 6:05-BK-14070-ABBPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARTHUR B. BRISKMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the Objection to Debtors’ Claim of Exemption 1 (“Objection”) filed by Bank One Kentucky, N.A. (“Bank One”). Bank One objects, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(p), to the homestead exemption claimed by Thomas William Sainlar and Sheryl A. Sainlar (collectively, the “Debtors”). An evidentiary hearing on the Objection was held on January 9, 2006 at which counsel for Bank One and counsel for the Debtors appeared. Bank One and the Debtors filed supporting legal memoranda. 2 An arnicas curiae brief was filed by the National…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In Re McNabbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2005
- In Re VirissimoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- In Re BlairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re VirissimoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greene v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Wallace v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- In Re PrestoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re RasmussenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Soulé v. Willcut (In re Willcut)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.