Legal Opinion

Herman Neff v. Dravo Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 21, 1969No. 17247PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GANEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal solely from the asserted inadequacy of a verdict and judgment entered thereon in favor of the plaintiff in an admiralty action which was filed for maintenance and cure and given the number of 65-15, combined with a civil action for damages, No. 65-322. In the civil action, under the Jones Act, judgment was entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $25,000.00, and in the admiralty action for $353.21. The district court tried the two actions separately before the same jury, pursuant to Fitzgerald v. United States…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Veronica Cox, Administratrix of the Estate of William D. Cox, in No. 74-1609 v. Dravo Corporation, in No. 74-1576Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Kathleen Ward, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles E. Ward, Deceased, in No. 18703 v. Union Barge Line Corporation, in No. 18704Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Adolph Berke v. Lehigh Marine Disposal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. George v. Hillman Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Costa Crociere, S.P.A. v. RoseDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API