Legal Opinion
Albert L. Micklus, Sr. v. Kay Greer
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1983No. 82-1991PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Albert Micklus filed suit against Kay Greer, 545 F.Supp. 183, an official of the Missouri Department of Mental Health, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his constitutional right to privacy. Micklus’s claim is based on allegations of “a clandestine and covert investigation ... of the mental and psychological condition” of Micklus and the malicious publication of information about Micklus’s mental health. He requested damages of $250,000.
This is the third lawsuit Micklus has filed relating to secret psychological…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joseph Nevijel v. North Coast Life Insurance Co., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Daniel Dewitt v. Officer R. F. Pail, Wesley M. Young, Assistant Superintendent, Southern Conservation CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Bernard E. Koll v. Wayzata State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Albert H. Carter v. The Money Tree CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Baker v. ChisomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Headley v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.