In Re Search of Electronic Communications
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentAmbro, Circuit Judge
I agree with my colleagues that the Speech or Debate Clause does not confer a privilege of confidentiality. Thus, the motion to quash the search warrant on that basis must be denied. Any other conclusion is foreclosed by a long line of precedent.1 However, that Fattah’s argument lacks merit does not, in my view, deprive us of jurisdiction to review his claim under the Perlman doctrine. “Rather, the lack of merit means that the claim of [privilege] should be denied for just that reason — it lacks merit.” Powell v. Ridge, 247 F.3d 520, 527 (3d Cir.2001) (Roth, J., dissenting). I thus…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Helstoski v. MeanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.