Legal Opinion
Diversified Mortgage Investors & Nine Corp. v. LaRose
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided December 3, 1980No. Bankruptcy No. 75-258PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HARVEY H. POSNER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Diversified Mortgage Investors (DMI)-a mortgage creditor of the debtor/bankrupt- and DMI’s wholly owned subsidiary, Nine Corporation, in seeking to acquire title to the mortgaged property, jointly filed a Complaint to Sell (certain immovable property) Subject to Certain Mortgages and Free and Clear of All Junior Mortgages, Liens and Privileges.
Inter alia, the complaint alleges that Frank W. Campbell, who was made a defendant, purports to be the holder of a promissory note the payment of which is secured by a mortgage on a portion of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Murdock MacHine and Engineering Company of Utah, Logan A. Bagley, Trustee for Murdock MacHine and Engineering Company of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re BanksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1982
- United States v. Murdock MachineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996