Marriage of J.A.S. v. R.J.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHYLLIS G. JONES, Judge.*
R.J.S. appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for visitation, contending there is inadequate evidence of endangerment to support the adjudication. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
The parties, appellant R.J.S. and respondent J.A.S., were divoreed in November 1991 after an 11-year marriage. Respondent was granted physical custody of A.S., born September 9, 1985, and appellant exercised visitation regularly through August 1992, when *26he was notified by a police officer that his visitation had been suspended because of allegations of his sexual abuse of A.K.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mnd v. BmdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- D.A.H. v. G.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Berthiaume v. BerthiaumeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- J.E.P. v. J.C.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- J.M.G. v. J.C.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marriage of Gales v. GalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Marriage of Gales v. GalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996