Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Aetna Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 28, 2006No. EDCV 05-466-SGLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DETERMINE STANDARD OF REVIEW
LARSON, District Judge.
Howard Boyd has filed suit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), challenging the denial of his application for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits. Boyd brings this action against his employer, Boeing Company (“Boeing”), Boeing’s long-term disability plan (“Plan”), and the Plan’s claims administrator and insurer, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”). 1 Currently before the Court is Boyd’s Motion to Determine the Standard for Reviewing Aetna’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Marjorie Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Tinker v. Versata, Inc. Group Disability Income Insurance PlanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Solien v. Raytheon Long Term Disability Plan 590District Court, D. Arizona · 2008