Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided February 4, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Philip Perrey General Counsel West Coast Inland Navigation District Post Office Drawer 9480 Bradenton, Florida 34206

Dear Mr. Perrey:

On behalf of the West Coast Inland Navigation District, you ask substantially the following question:

Is the West Coast Inland Navigation District liable for increment tax increases pursuant to s. 163.340, F.S.?

In sum, I am of the opinion:

Inasmuch as the West Coast Inland Navigation District is a multi-county special district levying ad valorem taxes in more than one county, the district is not liable for payment of the tax increment proceeds to community…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ervin v. Capital Weekly PostSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. First National Bank v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. State v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API