Legal Opinion

Katz v. Pacific Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action was brought by the plaintiff, a depositor in the defendant bank, to recover the sum of $10,000 damages claimed by the plaintiff by reason of the return of a check for $750, dated May 7, 1920, drawn by the plaintiff on the defendant and returned by the defendant unpaid, the plaintiff claiming that, at the time when said check was presented at the defendant bank, said plaintiff had sufficient funds on deposit with the defendant to meet said check.

No special damages are alleged or proved.

The amended answer is a general denial of all the allegations of the complaint except…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wiley v. Bunker Hill National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Schaffner v. EhrmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Citizens' National Bank of Davenport v. Importers & Traders' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Atlanta National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Davis v. Standard National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clearview Concrete Products Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API