Legal Opinion
Calli v. Forest View Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*899The defendants Forest View Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, Inc. (hereinafter Forest View), and Precision Health, Inc., doing business as Medfax Portable Diagnostics (hereinafter Precision Health), each demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them (see McLoughlin v Suffolk Obstetrics & Gynecology, LLP, 85 AD3d 984, 985 [2011]; Stukas v Streiter, 83 AD3d 18 [2011]; Breland v Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., 49 AD3d 789, 790 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiffs submissions, including the conclusory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Breland v. Jamaica Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ahmed v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- McLoughlin v. Suffolk Obstetrics & Gynecology, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matos v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Weingarten v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matos v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wong v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016