King v. Brooks
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, Justice.
OPINION
This is a suit for breach of contract. The controlling issue is whether and to what extent an interpretation of the contract provision in dispute made in a prior action between the parties is binding on them in the present suit, and dispositive of the questions presented in it.
In 1965 and 1966, respectively, the City of Fayetteville entered into contracts with the Highland Rim Utility District and the Mulberry Utility District in which the City agreed to furnish water to the districts. The following provision appeared as paragraph four of both contracts:
The rates to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shelley v. GipsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- National Cordova Corp. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- AL Kornman Co. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT, ETC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Doherty v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Pile v. PileTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Mullins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Allied Sound, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Holland-America Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chattanooga v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.