Legal Opinion

Vansant v. Dodds

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1932No. 30257Published

1Opinion

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR.

Appellee has urged in his suggestion of error that our opinion in this case is in conflict with the opinion in the other recent case of Fair v. Dickerson (Miss.), 144 So. 238, 239. In the latter case, it was said: "It is true that a judgment in replevin ordinarily determines nothing more than the right of the successful party to the immediate possession of the property in question; but, when the right to possession is dependent upon title or ownership, and title or ownership is the issue upon which the decision as to the right of possession actually turns, then a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fair v. DickersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Vansant v. DoddsMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API