Legal Opinion

Daniel Isiah Jones v. Ethan Bishop (ID 918), an officer employed by the Rapid City Police Department, in his individual capacity

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 28, 2026No. 5:26-cv-05049Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION DANIEL ISIAH JONES, 5:26-CV-05049-KES Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING AMENDED vs. COMPLAINT UNDER 1915A AND DIRECTING SERVICE ETHAN BISHOP (ID 918), an officer employed by the Rapid City Police Department, in his individual capacity, Defendant. Plaintiff, Daniel Isiah Jones, an inmate at the Pennington County Jail, filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 1. The court granted Jones’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and screened his initial complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Docket…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. In Re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Ketchum v. City of West MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Maxine Veatch v. Bartels Lutheran HomeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API