Legal Opinion

Walker v. Briner

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1952Published

1Opinion of the CourtHamm, J.

This is a motion hy Carl Briner and Hazel Briner above mentioned to vacate a notice of proposed examination before trial served by the defendant Nash-Kelvinator Corporation. Joseph L. Walker and Marion Walker mentioned above, the taking of whose testimony also is included in the notice of proposed examination, do not object to the examination. Joseph L. Walker and Marion Walker reside in Columbia County. Carl Briner and. Hazel Briner reside in Albany County. Columbia County improperly is designated as the place of examination of Carl Briner and Hazel Briner. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 300.) But the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Beacon Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Freisinger v. ReibachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API