Legal Opinion
Hamm v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 13, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The plaintiff was employed by the defendant corporation as pipefitter. The contract was made in Yew *566York City and the work was to be performed there. The negligence charged against the defendant corporation was the furnishing by it of a defective wrench to the plaintiff to be used by him in connecting certain pipes in a tank house erected on the roof of a certain building in New York City, so that the plaintiff, who was required to stand on beams not exceeding one and one-quarter inches in width, in the prosecution of his work and while…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiley v. . Solvay Process Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Nappa v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Heiser v. . Cincinnati Abattoir Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Heiser v. Cincinnati Abattoir Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. Ray Arnold Lumber Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Crawford v. Trans World AirlineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Matter of Lake Hopatcong Water Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Ritenour v. Creamery Service, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1941