Sturtevant v. Randall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
ON Report from JSTisi Prius, Barrows, J., presiding. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.
Assumpsit. The writ contains a count for money had and received and money paid, with specification of a promissory note signed by William Patten payable to the present defendant, upon the back of which the *150plaintiff and defendant have severally written their names, the latter above the former. No date or writing indicates when or for what purpose these names were placed there.
From the order in which they stand on the paper, in the absence of any controlling proof, the presumption would be that the defendant indorsed the note as payee thereof to the plaintiff, who subsequently had indorsed it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marsh v. PierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Moies v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Leopold v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Atkinson v. BennetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Young v. SehonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Montgomery v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.