People v. Raddatz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURMAN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Pursuant to a petition filed on behalf of the defendant, the trial judge, after a pretrial bench hearing, suppressed the defendant’s written confession. The State appeals from this order.
At the outset we are confronted with the contention by the defendant that the State has no right to appeal from an order suppressing a confession. We see no merit to this contention.
Supreme Court Rule 27 (Ill Rev Stats 1965, c 110, § 101.27) headed Procedure in Criminal Appeals provides in part:(4) In criminal cases the State may appeal from an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The People v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. LandghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- People v. RiszowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- People v. R. S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. GenusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.