Legal Opinion

Acevedo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 1997No. 96-2919Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

2Per curiam

This matter is before the court on the state’s motion to dismiss, which we deny. The state urges that by failing to assert below the lower court’s failure to file written reasons for departure in a Rule 3.800(b) motion, this court is deprived of jurisdiction. The failure to file a Rule 3.800(b) motion to correct sentence is not fatal to jurisdiction in a case such as this involving a (potential) post-sentencing omission of the lower court. The supreme court devised Rule 3.800(b) as a vehicle to raise sentencing errors not otherwise raised at sentencing. The appellant…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Britt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API