Legal Opinion
Kyne v. Carl Beiber Bus Services
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2001No. 00 CIV. 3370(RMB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiff Cecelia Kyne (“Plaintiff’ or “Kyne”) asserts, in a complaint filed May 3, 2000, and based upon “diversity jurisdiction” under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, that while she was at the Port Authority Bus Terminal in Manhattan on April 13, 1999, she sustained personal injuries arising from an alleged sexual assault by defendant Eugene Mertz (“Mertz”). Mertz was employed by Defendants Carl Beiber Bus Services, Carl R. Beieber, Inc., and Beiber Bus Company (collectively “Beiber”), and operated a bus owned by Beiber. Mertz allegedly invited…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ACE American Insurance Company v. University of GhanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Baroni v. The Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Baroni v. The Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022