Legal Opinion · Dissent

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. McCall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 2003No. A03A0062; A03A0063Published

1DissentBarnes, Judge

For the reasons stated in Judge Ozburn’s order denying summary judgment, I must respectfully dissent. While the judge found that Jason McCall was not a “relative” entitled to coverage under the terms of the policy, he further found that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether Jason was driving the vehicle with the permission of the named insureds. The trial judge analyzed the issue as follows:

Defendant Jason McCall testified that his father and stepmother had told him not to “get caught” driving the vehicle or Lacey Bush would no longer be allowed to borrow the car and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNeely v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Hartford Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Rolison v. Georgia Central Railway, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API