Legal Opinion

Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. CA A69952; SC S40277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision affirming an order of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) that revoked petitioner’s chiropractic license. ORS 684.100. Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 119 Or App 397, 850 P2d 411 (1993).

The issues are whether an assistant attorney general representing an agency pursuant to ORS 183.450(6) is an “agency representative,” as that term is used in ORS 183.450(8), 2 and whether petitioner’s right to procedural due process was violated in this proceeding. 3 We hold that an assistant attorney general representing an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Shicor v. Bd. of Speech Language Pathology & AudiologyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Quinton v. LT & L LOGGING, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Innovative Design & Construction, LLC v. Construction Contractors BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Bellet ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API