Legal Opinion · Dissent

Swift & Co. v. Weston

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1930No. 6,593Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

In this action the only statutes of the state of Nebraska pleaded in the answer are sections 1480 and 1463, quoted in the majority opinion. The cases of Armstrong v. Patterson, 97 Neb. 871, 152 N. W. 311, and Holmes v. Webster, 98 Neb. 105, 152 N. W. 312, 313, do not hold, as stated in the majority opinion, that section 1480 bars action on a domestic judgment in five years. In those cases the court was considering sections 7566 and 7567, Revised Statutes of Nebraska 1913, which provide: (7566) “Civil actions, other than for the recovery of real property, can only be brought within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snell v. RueNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Union Nat. Bank v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Armstrong v. PattersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Chaloupka v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Holmes v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API