Legal Opinion

Lowman v. Kuecker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 27, 1955No. 48681PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for damages arising out of an automobile collision. No issue as to his liability is raised, hence a statement of the circumstances surrounding the collision is not necessary.

I. Error is assigned in the submission to the jury, the issue of future medical care.

Appellee’s injury was a latent one and, as to future medical care, expert testimony was proper if not imperative. The Sole testimony offered npon this question was that of Dr. A. J. Laubenthal, a chiropractor, who appeared as an expert witness for the appellee. The collision occurred in January 1951.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Bragg v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Shover v. Iowa Lutheran HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Mathews v. BeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. Linge v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API