Lowman v. Kuecker
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for damages arising out of an automobile collision. No issue as to his liability is raised, hence a statement of the circumstances surrounding the collision is not necessary.
I. Error is assigned in the submission to the jury, the issue of future medical care.
Appellee’s injury was a latent one and, as to future medical care, expert testimony was proper if not imperative. The Sole testimony offered npon this question was that of Dr. A. J. Laubenthal, a chiropractor, who appeared as an expert witness for the appellee. The collision occurred in January 1951.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Bragg v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shover v. Iowa Lutheran HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Mathews v. BeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Linge v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.