Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sheltering Arms

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by James F. Smith and others, partners under the firm name of Smith & Co., against the Sheltering Arms and others, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment was rendered directing a sale of the premises of the Sheltering Arms, and payment, out of the proceeds, of the claims of plaintiffs and of defendant John Ember-son, and from said judgment the Sheltering Arms appeals. Reversed as to defendant Emberson.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by James F. Smith and others, partners under the firm name of Smith & Co., against the Sheltering Arms and others, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment was rendered directing a sale of the premises of the Sheltering Arms, and payment, out of the proceeds, of the claims of plaintiffs and of defendant John Ember-son, and from said judgment the Sheltering Arms appeals. Reversed as to defendant Emberson. Modified as to plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

The referee decided that the plaintiffs had a valid lien upon the premises of the appellant for the sum of $561.45,- and that the defendant Emberson had a valid lien against the same premises for the sum of $252.38. On September 14, 1891, one Charles W. Banham entered into a contract with the appellant for the construction of a building, and on the same day entered into another contract with the “Children’s Fold” for the construction of a building on the appellant’s land with the appellant’s consent. The plaintiffs furnished material, which was used in the buildings, and filed their *63lien on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Clief v. . Van VechtenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Lauer v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Stevens v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Larkin v. . McMullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Hollister v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cassino v. YacevichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API