Legal Opinion
Marthen v. Evans
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Hughes, J.
Respondents seek to dismiss this proceeding upon objections in point of law that: (1) the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding or grant the relief sought; (2) respondents Cooke, Mahoney, Harvey and Regan are not proper parties to the proceeding; (3) the proceeding is improperly commenced as a class action; and (4) the petition fails to state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief sought.
Petitioner George W. Marthen is the Hamilton County Court Judge and Surrogate, helving been elected to that office in 1971 by the people…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- MATTER OF TAYLOR v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- County of Oneida v. BerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- New York Post Corp. v. LeibowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Marro v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Cass v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Marthen v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981