Legal Opinion

Ray Harding v. George C. Lewis

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 27, 2003No. 13-02-00411-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-02-411-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RAY HARDING, Appellant,

v.

GEORGE C. LEWIS , Appellees.

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

O P I N I O N

Before Justice Rodriguez, Castillo and Wittig (1)

Opinion by Justice Wittig

Appellee, George C. Lewis, claims an equitable exception to dormant judgment rules under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Appellant, Ray Harding, contends that two trial court findings are factually insufficient. The court found that Harding's fraudulent conduct sought to evade execution of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API