Legal Opinion

Canatella v. Stovitz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 16, 2005No. C 00-01105 JSWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE BAR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WHITE, District Judge.

Now before the Court are the motions of Defendants Ronald W. Stovitz, Judith A. Epstein, Madge S. Watai, Richard A. Honn, Patrice E. McElroy, Alban I. Niles, Joann M. Remke, Robert M. Talcott, James E. Herman and Michael Nisperos, Jr.’s (collectively “Bar Defendants”) to dismiss Plaintiff Richard A. Canatella’s (“Canatella”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hersh v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Connecticut Bar Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API