Legal Opinion

Beal v. Dill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1953No. 38,818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

Plaintiffs brought this action for a decree holding invalid the provisions of a written lease for an extension of the term of the lease after the first year and praying for the cancellation of the lease and possession of the premises. Defendant filed an answer to the petition and also filed a cross petition seeking specific performance. The trial court held that the provision in the lease granting to the lessee an option to extend the lease beyond the primary term was void for the reason that it was too indefinite with respect to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frey v. WilleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Hultz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Ames v. AmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Haston v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Hawkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Edgewater Enterprises, Inc. v. HollerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Garnes v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. PJ's Pantry v. PuschakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Jahangiri v. 1830 North BayshoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API