Legal Opinion

United States v. Santoso

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 29, 2019No. 8:17-cv-03030Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division * UNITED STATES, * Petitioner, * v. Case No.: PWG-17-3030 * SHARON SANTOSO, * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Internal Revenue Service filed a petition to enforce an administrative summons it served on Sharon Santoso (a.k.a. Isarina Ali and Le le Ling). Pet., ECF No. 1. I previously determined that (a) the IRS had made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to have the petition enforced, and (b) Santoso had submitted sufficient evidence of non-possession of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Publishing Clearing House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. BarthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States of America v. S. Don HuckabyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API