Legal Opinion

York v. Civil Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2004No. Docket 246137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Respondent Family Independence Agency (FIA) employs petitioner Judy York as an assistance payment worker (APW). Petitioner sought to be reclassified in a higher-paying job classification, and the Department of Civil Service denied her request. Petitioner filed a technical appeal within the department, which was also denied. Petitioner appealed that decision to the Employment Relations Board (ERB) and then to respondent Civil Service Commission (CSC). Both appeals were denied. Petitioner sought judicial review of the CSC’s decision in the circuit court, which affirmed the CSC’s decision.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Judicial Attorneys Ass'n v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Youkhanna v. City of Sterling HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  3. Fred Lustig v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Lynn Goldberg v. 10034 Huntington Woods Investment LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Lynn Goldberg v. 10034 Huntington Woods Investment LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API