Moody v. Aiken County

May 8, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The exceptions numbered 1, 2, and 3 will be considered together. The admissibility of testimony is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the presiding Judge, and his ruling is not the subject of appeal unless there was an erroneous exercise of his discretion, which has not been made to appear in this case. These exceptions are therefore overruled.

The next exception that will be considered is No. 4. His Honor, the presiding Judge, thus construed the complaint and answer:

"Mr. Foreman, and Gentlemen of the Jury: The sum and substance of…