Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Cumberland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 26, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from his position as a train switch fabricator after he tested positive for the use of cocaine following a random drug test. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he was terminated for misconduct. Notably, claimant does not contest the accuracy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of JonassenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of BrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of LangleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of RizzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of YottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.