Goldmuntz v. Town of Chilmark
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
We are called on to determine whether a conservation restriction in perpetuity which burdens the plaintiff’s land in Chilmark prevents him from installing an in-ground swimming pool on the property. A Land Court judge answered that question in the affirmative and the plaintiff has appealed the resulting judgment. We affirm.
The restriction, key portions of which are reprinted as an appendix to this opinion, was granted in 1976 by the property’s former owner, Katharine Irving Morgan, to the town of Chilmark. Pursuant to G. L. c. 184, § 32, the restriction was accepted by the selectmen and was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scott v. Board of Appeal of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Parkinson v. Board of Assessors of MedfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Four B Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Ranch 10, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company v. The Nature Conservancy, a District of Columbia non-profit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Weston Forest & Trail Ass'n v. FishmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Chatham Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. FarberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- City of West Haven v. Gamelin, No. Cvnh 9708-8389 (Aug. 17, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Wildlands Trust of Southeastern Mass., Inc. v. Cedar Hill Retreat Center, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2020