Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Edmondson v. Colclazier
Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma
Decided June 14, 2002No. CJAD-01-2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoudreau, J.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
T1 Six separate complaints alleging that Judge Jerry Colclazier committed "oppression in office" were presented to the Trial Division of the Court on the Judiciary (Trial Division). The Trial Division filed its judgment on November 27, 2001, finding by clear and convincing evidence that four instances of conduct constituted "oppression in office" and warranted removal from office. The Trial Division also determined that Judge Col-clazier was disqualified to hold any future judicial office in Oklahoma. The instances of conduct were not disputed by the judge.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Harrod v. Illinois Courts CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Dodds v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Harrell v. Samson Resources Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re DiLeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING COLEMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING COLEMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN THE MATTER OF THE INVESTIGATION OF SHARON HOLMES, DISTRICT JUDGE, TULSA AND PAWNEE COUNTIES, OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2026
- In the Matter of Louis M.J. Dileo, a Former Judge of the Municipal Court (072095)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014