Legal Opinion

K.C. Fuel Oil Co. v. Shoecraft

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1925Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

ARNOLD, J.

We have read with much interest the very able argument of respondent on rehearing and and have carefully considered the citations therein. After so doing we adhere to the conclusions reached in the former opinion, following the rule laid down in Reitherman v. Wheeler et al., 247 S. W. 222, an opinion by this court which we are not prepared to overrule. That case has the support of the Supreme Court in O’Bannon v. Wydick, 281 Mo. 478, wherein is adopted the opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in the same case, 198 S. W. 432. We quote from the last-named opinion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Miller v. GeeserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. O'Bannon v. WydickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API