Rouse v. Wallace
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Rio Grande County.
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.
On the 19th day of January, 1895, the appellee took judgment by confession against Seth W. Hathaway and Jerome C. De Armond, upon a promissory note executed by them individually, for $498.86, including costs. Those persons were copartners, doing business under the firm name of Hathaway & De Armond. On the 21, day of February, 1895, the appellee caused execution to issue on his judgment, and had it levied upon a stock of goods and merchandise of the firm. On the following day the appellee commenced *94suit against the same persons, as individuals, upon another note executed by them, and caused a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Saunders v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Berkshire Woolen Company v. . JuillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Smith v. Smith Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Sickman v. HaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grove v. WallaceColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Grove v. WallaceColorado Court of Appeals · 1898